Can
we fail yet? Where and when does failure direct us? To answer this I ask yet
another question: What fruit is this?
Experience
provides me with information, sensations, instances of fruit that are like it,
fruits that I have handled and tasted, but those fruits are not this fruit.
Those fruits provide formal and sensual representations which may serve as a
kind of utopic ideal of this fruit, but the particular reality of this fruit,
let’s say its taste, resists incorporation and conflation with these
expectations. These expectations are bound to fail, to be replaced by the
assertion of the unexpected particulars I experience when biting into it. That
is what reveals that these other fruits are utopic, because they are not
topical here and now. The real presence replaces the ideal present. In this
way, realism through contradicting the ideal, through failure, disturbs our sense
of the potential towards material possibilities.
Failure
rhetoric as of late has tended to be utopic, in Jose Munoz’s line of thought,
revealing what is missing or failing in present realities and thus opens us up
to change. This does not go far enough. I argue that the experience of surprise
and failure in the topical reveals the reality that is missing in the imagined
present --- directing us towards changes which have already occurred and
towards a greater investment in the possibilities of the present, rather than
the potentials of the future. Put another way, failure is an object-ion to a
form of phantasmal subjectivity. Revolution is already underway, but it may be
enacted and directed by the fruits of the object-laden universe.
An
imagined theoretical proof of this I draw from the speculative medievalist work
of CS Lewis from the 1940s, drawing on scenes from the Great Divorce where the narrator is brought to paradise through a
dream vision and from Peralandra
where the protagonist is brought to paradise through angelic intervention. In
both cases, Lewis’s paradises bring the reader from a present day world into an
aesthetic suggesting the medieval aesthetic suggesting an unreachable elsewhere
time and place in existence. Drawing from medieval accounts of paradise, Lewis
furnishes both with signature ecological pieces, giving particular attention,
not surprisingly, to trees and fruit which uniquely disturb time and space.
In
the Great Divorce, fruits disappoint
a consumer attempt to collect, sell and make them into capital gains by
asserting a distinctive space. In Peralandra,
fruits disappoint a sensualist’s attempt to continually repeat a pleasure by
asserting of distinctive time. In these ways, he provides object lessons on
transformation through experiences of fruits and failure, on how the critique
of failure that Munoz claims makes the now into a not now, may be instead
imagined through speculative realism as failures which find the Utopic in the
here and now, where we may better attend to and work with real material
possibilities.
Lewis’s
speculative work, what he called his “supposal” literature, were aimed he
claims to alter our experience of the now by imagining our own reality shifted
in time, space or quality. The Great
Divorce follows in the tradition of the medieval dream-vision, offering a
sleeper who travels to paradise in real time and encounters
things-in-themselves, a world where the essential being of things have
flourished to such a point as to make blades of grass, leaves on trees, and
fruits on the ground to definite that they resist hardily change, even in
location, through a kind of ontological persistence. In the preface to the Great Divorce, Lewis writes, “[A
thing] does not move towards unity but away from it and the creatures grow
further apart as they increase in perfection. Good, as it ripens, becomes
continually more different… from other good” (Lewis, GD 465). This “ripening” thus defines difference and
distinctiveness of matter.
Taking
the case of such essential ripening to actual fruit, the dreamer in the tale
encounters a scene where another stranger to the land discovers a tree which
has just dropped a pile of these hard as diamond apples in front of him.
Working towards the scheme he shared with the dreamer earlier, he attempts to
pick up as many as he can to bring back home and sell as a whole new category
of product to sell. Failing to lift the pile, he attempts to just pick up one
and carries it a little way until he gives up and traveler and fruit fall to
the ground.
Suddenly,
the water-fall beside the tree begins to speak to the traveler, saying
"Fool… put it down. You cannot take it back. There is not room for it
[somewhere else]. Stay here and learn to eat such apples. The very leaves and
the blades of grass in the wood will delight to teach you" (Lewis, GD,
492). The dreamer then turns away from the scene as Duns Scotus, the 13th
century theologian literally appears to give a lesson on haecceities and how
the “this-ness” of a thing can serve an impetus for more pragmatic ontological
and ethical relations to the world. Lewis, revealed as the dreamer, admits his
love for Scotus before an orgasmic vision of the manifold coincidence of time
and space in the moment of the real shatters his vision and awakens him.
The
majority of Lewis’s other supposal literature take the form of a there and back
again narrative, where persons from the nominally real here and now travels to
another world, usually imagined overtly or covertly, expect for those familiar
with his sources, as a kind of medieval-ish other time and place. The most
familiar instance of this occurs across all the Chronicles of Narnia, but are
also present, much earlier, in his Space Trilogy, of which Peralandra forms the second installment.
In
this tale, Ransom is carried away from his English cottage by an angel, where
CS Lewis literally watches him disappear into the heavens. From there he is
carried to Venus, which he discovers has recently awakened into life as a new
Paradise. It shares critical similarities to medieval visions of Eden,
including one man, one woman, a tempter, and a plethora of fruiting trees and
non-violent animals. Lewis however introduces key differences into this
Paradise which distinguish it both from traditional visions of paradise and
from the one imagined in the Great
Divorce. Peralandra, rather than
embodying the essential, persisting being of things, instead emphasizes the
sensual, transforming becoming of things. It is an entirely aquatic planet
where the only lands are floating islands
with hills and valleys,
but hills and valleys which changed places every minute so that only a
cinematograph could make a contour map of it… A photograph, omitting the colors
and the perpetual variation of shape, would make them look deceptively like
landscapes in our own world, but the reality is very different; for they, are
dry and fruitful like land but their only shape is the inconstant shape of the
water beneath them… furnished what would have been a dozen landscapes on
Earth-now level wood with trees as vertical as towers, now a deep bottom where
it was surprising not to find a stream, now a wood growing on a hillside, and
now again, a hilltop. (Lewis, P., 36-37).
This
instance on the “now,” always different than any other “now” is an ethical, as
well as ontological, imperative for change, with Peralandra’s one and only rule
that no one may live on the planet’s one fixed land-mass.
This ontology of perpetual change
meets ethics for the protagonist after he discovers an orchard of trees on one
of these floating islands, where he tastes his first fruit, “so different from
every other taste…a totally new genus of pleasures,: something unheard of among
men” which he could only ever describe as “not like that.” Such an object is a
refusal of what Graham Harman calls the “undermining” and “over-mining” impulse
(Harman 8-11) to view it as an instrumental part of some-thing else, a topical
failure in the utopic dreams of the present’s relation to potential futures:
[As he was] about to
pluck a second one…for whatever cause, it appeared to him better not to taste
again. Perhaps the experience had been so complete that repetition would be a
vulgarity—like asking to hear the same symphony twice in a day… he stood...wondering
how often in his life on Earth he had reiterated pleasures not through desire,
but in the teeth of desire...as if life
were a film that could be unrolled twice
or even made to work backwards… of arresting the unrolling of the film.
(Lewis, P., 43).
What Lewis
did with the spatial particularity and hardness in the Great Divorce, he here
does with temporal particularity and inconstancy in Peralandra, demonstrating
that each thing in each moment is so real that trying to subsume it into a kind
of ideal type which can be exchanged across the world or sustained throughout
time. Having experienced this scene, Ransom turns and meets “the Green Lady”
who explicates this principle:
One goes into the forest
to pick food and already the thought of one fruit rather than another has grown
up in one’s mind. Then, it may be, one
finds a different fruit... One joy was
expected and another is given… at the very moment of the finding there is. a
kind of…a setting aside. The picture of the fruit you have not found is still,
for a moment, before you. And if you wished/you could keep it there… after the good you
had expected, instead of turning it to the good you had got. You could refuse the real good; you could
make the real fruit taste insipid by thinking of the other. (Lewis, P. 53).
Failing to
hold fruits across time and space reveals a disjuncture between the ideal &
failed now. Things we encounter are ever changing, never what we knew or
expected; failures disturb us from a utopian present to dwell-in-the-world here
and now; to taste its strangeness; All attest we don’t know what fruit this is,
but we can learn from it. Rather than look for potentials on the utopic horizon,
let us attend to the possibilities in the failure of the here and now, for
utopias that are not also topical will do the work of building for as Lewis writes, “Other things, other
blessings, other glories...But never that. Never in all worlds, that"
(Lewis, P., 65).
Harman, Graham. The Quadruple Object. Washington: Zero
Books, 2011.
Lewis, C.S. “The Great Divorce.” The Complete Works of CS Lewis. New York: Harper Collins
Publishers, 1946
Lewis, C.S. Peralandra.
New York: Scribner Inc., 1943.
These were awesome! Thanks for sharing it here!
ReplyDeleteI love this blog. I will always credit you for ability to read.
ReplyDeletehttps://birdsoasis.com